Skip to main content

Pitcher v. Livingston

Citations

  • 4 Johns. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that expansion by a “first user” will constitute infringement upon a later user of a mark if expansion would result in “likelihood of confusion in derogation of established rights of the intervening user”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kent, Ness, Spencer, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.