Pistella v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• factfinder must “make crucial findings of fact on all essential issues necessary for [appellate] review . . . but is not required to address specifically each bit of evidence offered”
• the WCJ erred in admitting a surveillance tape which had not been properly authenticated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).