Skip to main content

Pistacchio v. Frasso

Citations

  • 723 S.E.2d 322
  • 314 Ga. App. 119
  • 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 531
  • 2012 WL 503586
  • 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the trial court’s dismissal of an appeal when the transcript was filed over three months after the notice of appeal and the delay prevented an appellate decision at the earliest possible date
  • speculative assertion that delay would not have caused the appeal to be docketed at a later term of court was mere conjecture
  • “The [three-month] delay here discernibly delayed docketing of the record in the appellate court and prevented an appellate decision on the merits at the earliest possible date.”
  • “The [three-month] delay here discernibly delayed docketing of the record in the appellate court and prevented an appellate decision on the merits at the earliest possible date.”
  • delay of almost three months “discernibly delayed docketing of the record in the appellate court and prevented an appellate decision on the merits at the earliest possible date”
  • “[T]he failure to obtain the required extension of time is one of the factors considered in whether a delay in filing a transcript is unreasonable and inexcusable.” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Mikell, Dillard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Pistacchio v. Frasso

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.