Skip to main content
· 9/23/1974

Pisiechko v. Diaddorio

Citations

  • 230 Pa. Super. 295
  • 326 A.2d 608
  • 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • by failing to answer to new matter, averments were treated as admitted; judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of the defendant
  • affirmative defenses may be raised as a new matter to a complaint, which, “taking all of the allegations of the complaint to be true, is nevertheless a defense to the action.”
  • “In the instant case, plaintiff’s failure to answer New Matter permitted the lower court to treat the averments contained therein as admitted, and therefore, a judgment on the pleadings was properly entered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.