Piser v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s efforts to cooperate were “negligible” and warrant summary judgment when “(1) plaintiff failed to sign a financial authorization allowing [defendant] to check his credit; (2) plaintiff failed to submit to an examination under oath; and (3
• finding that the plaintiff failed to cooperate where, inter alia, he did not submit to an EUO or provide all the requested financial documentation
• noting a plaintiff cannot rely on the allegations in his own complaint to refute a section 2-619 affidavit
• noting the failure to challenge or contradict supporting affidavits filed with a section 2-619 motion results in admission of the facts stated therein
• “The failure to challenge or contradict supporting affidavits filed with a section 2-619 motion results in an admission of the facts stated therein.”
• trial court has discretion in deciding whether statements are hearsay and whether they fall into an exception to the hearsay rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).