Skip to main content
· 4/28/1995

Piquard v. City of East Peoria

Citations

  • 887 F. Supp. 1106
  • 4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1716
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11467
  • 1995 WL 326288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \[a]n entity may not contract with organizations that provide employee fringe benefits if the relationship subjects the disabled employee\ to discrimination prohibited by the ADA
  • plaintiff police officer alleging disability discrimination may maintain cause of action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (see 42 U.S.C. § 1201 et seq. (1994)) in addition to cause under the Review Law
  • plaintiff police officer alleging disability discrimination may maintain cause of action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (see 42 U.S.C. §1201 et seq. (1994)) in addition to cause under the Review Law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mihm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.