Skip to main content
· 11/5/1997

Pippinger v. Treasury

Citations

  • 129 F.3d 519
  • 1997 WL 697800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “inherent difficulty” of conducting investigation without the information at issue
  • “To hold otherwise would slice the bread of the ‘need to know’ exception far thinner than we believe Congress intended.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Baldock, Ebel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.