Pippin v. Burkhalter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there can be no implied right of action in favor of the purchaser under the Act because it was intended to protect a class of loans rather than purchasers
• “It is clear that the provisions are intended to protect a class of loans supervised, approved, regulated or insured by the federal government and all those associated with such loans. There can be no implied cause of action in the purchaser.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).