Skip to main content
· 4/22/1997

Pipkin v. Pennsylvania State Police

Citations

  • 693 A.2d 190
  • 548 Pa. 1
  • 1997 Pa. LEXIS 812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining at-will employment to mean that employees “may be terminated at any time, for any reason or for no reason”
  • no cause of action may be maintained for termination of the at-will relationship except where “clear mandates of public policy” are threatened
  • no cause of action may be maintained for termination of the at-will relationship except where \clear mandates of public policy\ are threatened
  • State Troopers on probationary status do not have a property right in continued employment
  • “A governmental employee only has a personal or property right in his employment where he can establish a legitimate expectation of continued employment through either a contract or a statute.”
  • “The creation of a property interest turns on the substantive protection afforded to the employee pursuant to a state statute or contract and cannot be created by any procedural protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Zappala, Gappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.