Piper v. Piper
Citations
- 78 Kan. 82
- 95 P. 1051
- 1908 Kan. LEXIS 11
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Resulting Trust — Evidence — Parol — Circumstantial. . Facts from which a trust by implication of law arises may be established by parol evidence or by proof partly in parol and partly in writing; and, where the claim is that the purchase of land was made by and for the benefit of several and the conveyance taken in the name of only one, any writing prepared at the time, as well as the negotiations of the parties, their acts and conduct, and all the circumstances in connection with the transaction tending to prove a trust, may be shown in evidence.</p>
Judges: Johnston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gereke v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Kansas· 1948-06-12· cited 11×
- Starbuck v. KingoreSupreme Court of Kansas· 1922-11-04· cited 9×
- Corson v. OakleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1933-12-09· cited 8×
- Stevens v. HicksSupreme Court of Kansas· 1911-03-11· cited 4×
- Commissioner v. MolterTenth Circuit· 1932-08-24· cited 3×
- Eadie v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-02-06· cited 3×
- Pollman v. CurticeEighth Circuit· 1919-01-15· cited 2×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.