Pipefitters Welfare Educational Fund v. Westchester Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that FEHB Statements of Benefits are regulations to be reviewed under “plainly erroneous” standard of review and warning that Court “must not substitute its own judgment for that of the administrative agency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).