Pioneer Technology, Inc. v. Eastwood (In Re Pioneer Technology, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insider transaction did not fall within scope of § 547(c)(2)
• relying on affidavit of debtor’s comptroller that creditor received more than it would have in a hypothetical Chapter 7 to hold that the debtor had met its burden under section 547(b)(5)
• “short term loan made by a debtor’s shareholder in order to allow the debtor to maintain operations despite capitalization problems falls [outside] the ordinary course of business exception”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).