Pioneer Savings Bank v. Audubon Quality Homes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• avoiding a contractual interpretation that would lead to an illogical result
• “[W]hether or not a contract is ambiguous is a question of law for the court, as to which expert testimony is not cognizable. Thus, we have no occasion to consider the affidavit of a purported expert ... which characterizes the [Policy] as ambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).