Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• also acknowledging that, in a particular case, the evidence might conceivably permit only a binary choice between two end points
• although no witness testified specifically that 35% of utility's computer system should be considered used and useful and included in its rate base, agency could reasonably infer that calculation from evidence that (1
• “The Commission was entitled to take into consideration the fact that Cap Rock's rates had not been regulated by the Commission for a substantial period of time and, therefore, that Cap Rock had to create much of its rate-filing package from scratch.”
• Direct Testimony of S. Goodfriend at 11-71 of 117

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).