Pioneer Mining Co. v. Pacific Coal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “plaintiff’s allegations cannot support the simultaneous pursuit of relief under RCFC 60(b)(1) and (b)(6) because the provisions are mutually exclusive and because plaintiff’s entire amended motion is properly construed as seeking relief for ‘excusable neglect’”
• “[T]he fact that plaintiff’s original [Rule] 60(b) motion was timely filed . . . does not prevent plaintiff’s amended motion from being time-barred.”
• “To the extent plaintiff still seeks relief under RCFC 60(b)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).