Pioneer Life & Casualty Co. v. Broxson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting an ineffectiveness claim for not advising about legislation that was enacted but not yet effective at the time of plea
• permitting an ineffectiveness claim for not advising about legislation that was enacted but not yet effective at the time of plea
• remanding to PCRA court for an evidentiary hearing despite deficient witness certifications, where the PCRA court failed to notify appellant of the defects, and appellant raised an ineffectiveness claim of arguable merit
• remanding for the appellant to satisfy § 9545(d)(1) because the PCRA court did not cite the lack of compliance therewith in its Rule 907 notice to afford him the opportunity to amend his petition
• remanding for an evidentiary hearing because underlying legal claim had arguable merit
• stating, “[g]iven our conclusion that Appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel potentially has arguable merit, we agree with [Lippert] that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing in order to attempt to prove his claim[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).