Skip to main content
· 4/10/2013

Pinto v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 938 F. Supp. 2d 25
  • 2013 WL 1445344
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the hearing officer “ordered DCPS to conduct appropriate evaluations of [the student] and convene a meeting to revise his IEP as appropriate within 30 days of a written request by plaintiffs”
  • noting that Hearing Officer determined that DCPS had developed inappropriate IEP, but declined to grant placement at private school and instead ordered District to \convene a meeting to revise [the] IEP as appropriate within 30 days of a written request by Plaintiffs\
  • noting that Hearing Officer determined that DCPS had developed inappropriate IEP, but declined to grant placement at private school and instead ordered District to “convene a meeting to revise [the] IEP as appropriate within 30 days of a written request by Plaintiffs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Paul L. Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.