Pinos-Gonzalez v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board, as an appellate body, has discretionary authority to refuse to consider arguments not raised below
• concluding that an applicant has no constitutionally protected liberty or property interest in the discretionary relief of cancellation of removal, and cannot establish a due process right to obtain that relief
• explaining that the BIA has authority to prescribe procedural rules governing the proceedings before it and approving of the BIA’s rule that issues not raised to the IJ are unreviewable by the BIA
• explaining that the Board can “appropriately apply the doctrine of waiver”
• finding no error in Board’s application of 2 USCA4 Appeal: 23-1825 Doc: 27 Filed: 06/03/2024 Pg: 3 of 3 procedural waiver to applicant
• finding no error in Board’s application of 2 USCA4 Appeal: 22-1220 Doc: 18 Filed: 10/17/2022 Pg: 3 of 3 procedural waiver to applicant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).