Skip to main content
· 10/22/1984

Pinole Point Properties, Inc. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

Citations

  • 596 F. Supp. 283
  • 21 ERC 1869
  • 15 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20173
  • 21 ERC (BNA) 1869
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that supervision by EPA is not a requisite for an action under section 9607(a)(4)(B)
  • “This factual determination cannot be made on the basis of the pleadings but must await development of a factual record.”
  • “[Cjonsistency with the National Contingency Plan, not pre-authorization or appearance on the National Priorities list, is all that is required under section 107(a)(4)(B).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aguilar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.