Pino v. Maplewood Packing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a mistake as to the nature of the injury “more readily fits a general description of the injury, i.e., damaged shoulder, than a specific diagnosis in connection therewith — tear of the rotator cuff’
• stating, although not in a case of estoppel against a governmental entity, that it is not an essential element of estoppel that the party subjected to it knowingly or intentionally misled the other person
• no waiver of employer’s right to assert bar to employee’s worker’s compensation claim because employer did not know filing requirement
• negligent conduct must be the “equivalent of fraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).