Pinnacle Port Community Association, Inc. v. Charles Orenstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that Florida courts have not limited partnership by estoppel to matters involving financial credit and construing credit to mean detrimental reliance on the purported partnership
• providing that Florida courts have not limited partnership by estoppel to matters involving financial credit and construing credit to mean detrimental reliance on the purported partnership
• “[I]n general, the law governing partnerships is applicable to joint ventures.”
• no joint venture where lender “would fund [condominium development] on an ‘as needed’ basis” and developer and lender “each had agents on site who had independent areas of control,” and “the actions of one did not bind the other”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).