Pinn Ex Rel. Stephen P. v. Harrison Central School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an administrative officer’s conclusion that a student was denied a FAPE was insufficient to satisfy the intent requirement under § 504
• finding that SRO did not err in concluding that private placement was inappropriate considering, inter alia, that the student did not have the opportunity to take mainstream classes
• finding private placement inappropriate because student had one-on-one instruction and “did not have the opportunity for taking classes in mainstream settings”
• rejecting Rehabilitation Act claim when the District “never ignored [pjlaintiffs request” for classification, “attempted to address” the issues raised, “sought out additional information,” and “ultimately classified [the child]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).