Pinkston v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a party who “indicate[d] only opposition to the petition in questionnaires” cannot be considered a petition supporter
• “SKF resolved the facial First Amendment challenge presented in these cases. We are bound to follow this precedent. ...”
• “SKF resolved the facial First Amendment challenge presented in these cases. We are bound to follow this precedent . . . .”
• “We are bound to follow this precedent and are not free to revisit the First Amendment arguments that were before the SKF panel.”
• “Chez Sidney repeatedly referred to the fact that the producer expressed affirmative support for the petition at one point — i.e., in the preliminary questionnaire.”
• “Appellants did not indicate support for the petition in a questionnaire and did not actively oppose the petition. We hold that Appellants have not supported the petition under the plain meaning of the Byrd Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).