· 4/11/2002
Pinkerton & Laws, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
Citations
- 227 F. Supp. 2d 1348
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20715
- 2002 WL 31398587
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, because attorneys’ fees statutes are substantive for Erie purposes, a Georgia court would not apply Georgia’s bad-faith litigation attorneys’ fee statute “if the laws of some other state should be applied to the issues” in the case
- concluding exclusion j(5) did not apply when water damage resulted to other property after improper installation of windows
- citations 5 Robert also brought a bad faith claim pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 13-6-11 but later conceded that O.C.G.A. § 33-4-6 provides the exclusive remedy for an insurer’s bad faith. (Interpleader Def.’s Resp. Interpleader Pl.’s Mot. Dismiss 13, DN 46
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Story
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.