Skip to main content
· 4/11/2002

Pinkerton & Laws, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Co. of America

Citations

  • 227 F. Supp. 2d 1348
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20715
  • 2002 WL 31398587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, because attorneys’ fees statutes are substantive for Erie purposes, a Georgia court would not apply Georgia’s bad-faith litigation attorneys’ fee statute “if the laws of some other state should be applied to the issues” in the case
  • concluding exclusion j(5) did not apply when water damage resulted to other property after improper installation of windows
  • citations 5 Robert also brought a bad faith claim pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 13-6-11 but later conceded that O.C.G.A. § 33-4-6 provides the exclusive remedy for an insurer’s bad faith. (Interpleader Def.’s Resp. Interpleader Pl.’s Mot. Dismiss 13, DN 46

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Story

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.