Pink Dot, Inc. v. Teleport Communications Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging the federal filed rate doctrine, but concluding that no similar doctrine applies to ratemaking by state agencies under California law
• noting differences between the federal filed rate doctrine and California’s filed rate doctrine, and concluding that the limitations on California’s doctrine do not preclude some state statutory and common law claims
• declining to apply federal filed rate 10 where no federal rate was implicated
• finding contractual provision providing for complete elimination of liability for willful misconduct or for violation of law to be unenforceable under Section 1668, but tacitly finding a $10,000 cap on damages available for redress of gross negligence to be outside the scope of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).