Appellate Court of Illinois· 7/25/2001
Pinilla v. Harza Engineering Co.
Citations
- 755 N.E.2d 23
- 324 Ill. App. 3d 803
- 257 Ill. Dec. 921
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Recognition Act only provides the means to recognize, not the procedure to file or enforce foreign judgment
- indicating that court should determine whether foreign judgment is capable of recognition before determining whether foreign judgment is capable of enforcement
- indicating that court should determine whether foreign judgment is capable of recognition before determining whether foreign judgment is capable of enforcement
- once a foreign country’s judgment is recognized, it is subject to enforcement procedures
- once a foreign country’s judgment is recognized, it is subject to enforcement procedures
- once a foreign country's judgment is recognized, it is subject to enforcement procedures
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Electrolines, Inc. v. Prudential Assurance Co., Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals· 2004-03-19· cited 47×
- Bianchi v. Savino Del Bene International Freight Forwarders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-05-07· cited 41×
- Revolution Portfolio, LLC v. BealeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-06-26· cited 34×
- Manco Contracting Co.(WLL) v. BezdikianCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-11-17· cited 26×
- GENUJO LOK Beteiligungs GmbH v. ZornSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2008-03-18· cited 24×
- Julie Q. v. Department of Children and Family ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-12-22· cited 11×
- Pnevmatikos v. PappasAppellate Court of Illinois· 2025-09-02· cited 7×
- Logemann Holding, Inc. v. LieberAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-26· cited 3×
- CE Design Ltd. v. Healthcraft Products, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-07-19· cited 3×
- GUIMARAES v. Northrop Grumman Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2007-10-30· cited 2×
- Julie Q. v. Department of Family ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-12-22· cited 2×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-08-26· cited 738×
- Collins v. Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-03-18· cited 210×
- McGee v. State Fam Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-07-31· cited 98×
- Collins v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, FIREMEN'S ANNUITY & BEN. FUND OF CHICAGOIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-03-18· cited 90×
- Deloney v. Board of Education of Thornton Township, School District No. 205Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-05-31· cited 73×
- Zalduendo v. ZalduendoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-01-13· cited 41×
- Forest City Erectors v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-06-03· cited 36×
- Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-11-16· cited 20×
- Hager v. HagerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1971-10-08· cited 20×
- La Societe Anonyme Goro v. Conveyor Accessories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-03-05· cited 15×
- Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-11-03· cited 9×
- In Re Marriage of BrownAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-02-20· cited 9×
- Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-10-29· cited 6×
- In Re Marriage of AgathosAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-01-24· cited 3×
Other cases named Pinilla v. Harza Engineering Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.