Skip to main content

Pinilla v. Harza Engineering Co.

Citations

  • 755 N.E.2d 23
  • 324 Ill. App. 3d 803
  • 257 Ill. Dec. 921

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Recognition Act only provides the means to recognize, not the procedure to file or enforce foreign judgment
  • indicating that court should determine whether foreign judgment is capable of recognition before determining whether foreign judgment is capable of enforcement
  • indicating that court should determine whether foreign judgment is capable of recognition before determining whether foreign judgment is capable of enforcement
  • once a foreign country’s judgment is recognized, it is subject to enforcement procedures
  • once a foreign country’s judgment is recognized, it is subject to enforcement procedures
  • once a foreign country's judgment is recognized, it is subject to enforcement procedures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Pinilla v. Harza Engineering Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.