Ninth Circuit· 5/2/2008
Pinholster v. Ayers
Citations
- 525 F.3d 742
- 2008 WL 1914699
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “any error the Nos. 05-4700 & 06-1834 17 district court may have committed” at evidentiary hearing addressing ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim was harmless because defendant failed to show he was preju- diced by counsel’s alleged shortcomings
- “Deference to state court decisions applies only to claims the state court adjudicated on the merits”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kozinski, Fisher, Tallman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court· 2011-04-04· cited 5,931×
- Bond v. BeardThird Circuit· 2008-08-20· cited 207×
- Robert Wayne Holsey v. Warden, Georgia Diagonstic PrisonEleventh Circuit· 2012-09-13· cited 107×
- Pinholster v. AyersNinth Circuit· 2009-12-09· cited 66×
- Drake v. PortuondoSecond Circuit· 2009-01-23· cited 61×
- United States v. ErvinSeventh Circuit· 2008-09-02· cited 27×
- Gentry v. SinclairW.D. Washington· 2008-09-15· cited 8×
- Madrigal v. YatesC.D. California· 2009-09-03· cited 8×
- Oliva v. HedgpethC.D. California· 2009-02-09· cited 4×
- Gallegos v. SchriroD. Arizona· 2008-09-29· cited 3×
- White v. OllisonC.D. California· 2008-12-12· cited 3×
- Ramirez v. AlmagerC.D. California· 2008-11-18· cited 2×
- Quintero v. TiltonC.D. California· 2008-11-26· cited 1×
- Boulware v. MarshallC.D. California· 2008-12-09
- Gauthier v. DexterC.D. California· 2008-08-19
- Duvardo v. GiurbinoN.D. California· 2009-01-06
- Calderon v. SistoC.D. California· 2009-04-06
- United States v. Ervin, JamesSeventh Circuit· 2008-09-02
- Pinholster v. WoodfordNinth Circuit· 2009-12-09
- Flores v. StewartNinth Circuit· 2008-05-21
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court· 1999-06-07· cited 6,799×
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 5,961×
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,124×
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court· 2002-05-28· cited 4,309×
- Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court· 2007-05-14· cited 3,241×
- Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court· 2002-11-04· cited 2,207×
- Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court· 2005-06-20· cited 1,891×
- Burger v. KempSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,706×
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 1,638×
- Anderson v. HarlessSupreme Court· 1982-11-01· cited 1,550×
- Woodford v. GarceauSupreme Court· 2003-03-25· cited 823×
- Leif Taylor v. Thomas M. Maddox, Interim Director George Galaza Cal TerhuneNinth Circuit· 2004-05-10· cited 790×
- Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett, Donald Eugene Lambert v. James BlodgettNinth Circuit· 2004-12-28· cited 542×
- People v. PinholsterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-02-20· cited 384×
- Armando Castillo v. James McFadden Arizona Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-02-24· cited 362×
- Robert Lewis Himes v. S. Frank ThompsonNinth Circuit· 2003-07-10· cited 343×
- Jesus Garcia Delgado v. Gail Lewis, Deputy Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2000-08-23· cited 327×
- Pirtle v. MorganNinth Circuit· 2002-12-19· cited 323×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.