Skip to main content
· 7/11/1995

Pineo v. Reeves Bank (In Re Arthur F. Hazen & Co.)

Citations

  • 184 B.R. 233
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 967
  • 27 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 620
  • 1995 WL 421439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court applied Deprizio doctrine notwithstanding 94 Act and lack of Third Circuit authority on the issue since the literal interpretation required it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joseph L. Cosetti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.