Skip to main content
· 5/6/1997

Pineda v. Almacenes Pitusa, Inc.

Citations

  • 982 F. Supp. 88
  • 1997 WL 662966

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that reliance on the identity of interests concept is unnecessary when an amended complaint seeks to bring in the same, rather than a closely-related, entity under its proper name
  • noting that notice, not service, is the determining factor in a Rule 15(c) analysis
  • serving a secretary authorized to receive summonses imputed knowledge to her employer that the original complaint was directed against the employer rather than a non-existent entity
  • serving a secretary authorized to receive summonses imputed knowledge to her employer that the original complaint was directed against the employer rather than a non-existent entity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casellas, District-Judge, Arenas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.