· 3/23/1989
Pine v. Rust
Citations
- 535 N.E.2d 1247
- 404 Mass. 411
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Punitive damages are not favored in Massachusetts, and we have long followed the principle that, absent statutory authorization, punitive damages may not be awarded.”
- “To be actionable under [the civil remedy section] ... an interception need not rise to the level of criminal conduct covered by the penal provisions of the law”
- violation of wiretap statute did not survive plaintiff s death because privacy interests protected by the statute lack clear definition and are ephemeral
- privacy interest violated by wiretap is ephemeral personal right and does not survive death in absence of statute
- cause of ____ action under G.L. ch. 272, 99 for illegal interception of 8 2. 5 U.S.C. 552a(b
- “If an offer of the statutory minimum amount of damages were all that could be expected by plaintiffs, there would be no need for provision in the law for the award of attorney’s fees”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch, O'Connor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.