Pine v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Superior Court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because there was no hearing requirement and the agency proceeding was not a contested case
• holding that a proceeding did not fall under the APA's definition of a contested case and the APA's judicial review section was inapplicable where a hearing was not required by law
• declining to reach remaining issues where Superior Court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction
• where statute did not require hearing, matter was not a contested case suitable for judicial review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).