Pine Ridge Realty, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts will not interpret even an ambiguous insurance contract “to provide coverage that was never contemplated by the parties.”
• explaining that “[t]he touchstone of contract interpretation is the intent of the parties”
• “In the insurance context, when a loss occurs after a binder has been issued, but before- a policy is written, the insurer is bound to provide coverage in line with its standard policies referenced in the binder (citations omitted
• “In the insurance context, when a loss occurs after a binder has been issued, but before- a policy is written, the insurer is bound to provide coverage in line with its standard policies referenced in the binder (citations omitted) or policies standard throughout the industry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).