Pine Oak Builders, Inc. v. Great American Lloyds Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In deciding the duty to defend, the court should not consider extrinsic evidence from either the insurer or the insured that contradicts the allegations of the underlying petition.”
• “In deciding the duty to defend, the court should not consider extrinsic evidence from either the insurer or the insured that contradicts the allegations of the underlying petition.”
• facts actually established in the underlying suit control the duty to indemnify
• where the relevant policies contained “‘continuous or repeated exposure’ language,” “each insurer would have a duty to defend against any claim that alleges potential property damage from a continuous or repeated exposure falling within a relevant policy period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).