Pindle v. Poteat

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Fletcher III and holding that parole regula-lions are not laws for purposes of the ex post facto analysis
• collecting authority for the proposition that parole guidelines cannot be considered “laws” for purpose of the Ex Post Facto Clause
• collecting authority for the proposition that parole guidelines cannot be considered “laws” for purpose of the Ex Post Facto Clause
• addressing an ex post facto challenge of the same 1999 guidelines in this case and stating that the issue was whether these guidelines resulted in an “increase in the time in which petitioner is likely to spend in custody”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).