Pinder v. Pinder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Under the compulsory language of [rule 1.610(b)], the trial court has no discretion to dispense with the requirement of a bond.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hinckley v. Department of Revenue
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-05· cited 5×
• Pinder v. Pinder
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 3×
• MICHAEL MAYS, KALA HENNESSEY, and MGM RESTORATION, LLC v. JOE TAYLOR RESTORATION, INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-08-24
• RALPH GRAHAM AND NICHOLE RENE GRAHAM vs CHERYL BATTEY AND ROLAND TUCKER
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-09-16

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-10-04· cited 1,882×
• Bellach v. Huggs of Naples, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-17· cited 25×
• Pinder v. Pinder
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-25· cited 13×
• Doss v. Doss
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-12· cited 3×