· 3/24/1988
Pinder v. Lomas & Nettleton Co. (In Re Pinder)
Citations
- 83 B.R. 905
- 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 392
- 1988 WL 25235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- lender (HUD) has burden of proving compliance with the requirements of the TILA
- plaintiffs’ testimony that they did not receive disclosures sufficient to rebut presumption
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David A. Scholl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.