Pincus Hueter v. Kruse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• it is well established that the “jury are permitted to infer malice from the use of a dangerous weapon”
• “Prosecutors must limit the scope of their closing arguments to facts in evidence and the fair inferences that may be drawn therefrom”
• “Prosecutors must limit the scope of their closing arguments to facts in evidence and the fair inferences that may be drawn therefrom”
• “The jury, as the finders of fact, were free to reject the defendant’s version of events in its entirety”
• \Prosecutors must limit the scope of their closing arguments to facts in evidence and the fair inferences that may be drawn therefrom\
• “The prohibition of Doyle applies only to police interrogations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).