Pinar v. Dole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• endorsing position “that federal courts have the authority to grant injunctive relief to the victim of a constitutional violation by virtue of their jurisdiction to decide all cases arising under the Constitution”
• \[D]ue process is flexible and calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands.\
• “[I]n Bush v. Lucas, 462 U.S. 367 (1983), the Supreme Court declined to permit a federal employee to bring a Bivens-type cause of action . . . against his supervisors for alleged violations of his first amendment rights.” (parallel citation omitted)
• no claim for injunctive relief for \minor\ personnel action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).