Pima County by City of Tucson v. Maya Const. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where two statutes seemingly conflict, they should be interpreted to give effect to both
• holding that where two statutes seemingly conflict, they should be interpreted to give effect to both
• applying Fleming by analogy, holding that a claim covered by both a claims statute and an arbitration clause does not “accrue” until the arbitration award issues
• “[I]f statutes relate to the same subject and are thus in pari materia, they should be construed together ... as though they constituted one law.”
• “[W]hen reconciling two or more statutes, courts should construe and interpret them, whenever possible, in such a way so as to give effect to all the statutes involved.”
• statutes relating to same subject are pari materia and are construed together with other related statutes as one law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).