· 4/26/1985
Pilon v. Pilon
Citations
- 492 A.2d 59
- 342 Pa. Super. 52
- 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7242
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting distinction between “good reasons” and “compelling reasons” and defining compelling as “tending to convince or convert by or as if by forcefulness of evidence”
- “Absent compelling reasons to separate siblings, they should be reared in the same household to permit the ‘continuity and stability necessary for a young child’s development.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McEwen, Cercone, Handler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.