Skip to main content
· 4/26/1985

Pilon v. Pilon

Citations

  • 492 A.2d 59
  • 342 Pa. Super. 52
  • 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting distinction between “good reasons” and “compelling reasons” and defining compelling as “tending to convince or convert by or as if by forcefulness of evidence”
  • “Absent compelling reasons to separate siblings, they should be reared in the same household to permit the ‘continuity and stability necessary for a young child’s development.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Cercone, Handler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.