Pillsbury v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the mere fact that a factual determination is labeled a conclusion of law does not make it so and that an agency cannot avoid its obligation to honor an ALJ’s findings of fact by attempting to categorize them as such
• reversing revocation of child care facility license based on agency's failure to state that ALJ's rejected fact findings were not supported by competent, substantial evidence
• “[T]he obligation of the agency to honor the hearing officer’s findings of fact cannot be avoided by categorizing a contrary finding as a conclusion of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).