Pillsbury Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• insured’s reasonable determination that product may not be fit for human consumption equates to direct physical loss
• use of cans with ‘‘tin free steel . . . ends’’ when processing cans of cream-style corn ‘‘result[ed] in [the] underprocessing of the product’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).