· 4/23/1964
Pillo v. Reading Company
Citations
- 232 F. Supp. 761
- 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- satisfied judgment against individual tortfeasors barred plaintiff’s subsequent action for same injuries under Federal Employers’ Liability Act; second action would lead to double recovery since plaintiff “had his day in court and has presumably received full compensation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginbotham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.