Skip to main content
· 4/23/1964

Pillo v. Reading Company

Citations

  • 232 F. Supp. 761
  • 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • satisfied judgment against individual tortfeasors barred plaintiff’s subsequent action for same injuries under Federal Employers’ Liability Act; second action would lead to double recovery since plaintiff “had his day in court and has presumably received full compensation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.