Piller v. S. Pac. R.R.
Citations
- 52 Cal. 42
Syllabus
<p>Statute of Limitations.—The liability of a railroad company for damages for an injury done to a passenger by collision of its cars, accrues when the collision occurs and the action must be brought within two years from such time.</p> <p>Idem.—The fact that the injured person does not recover for a long time does not extend the time for bringing the action.</p> <p>Two Yeabs’ Clause in Statute of Limitations.—The two years’ limitation for commencing an action, found in the first clause of the first subdivision of sec. 339 of the Code of Civil Procedure, applies to all actions at law not specifically mentioned in other portions of the statute.</p> <p>Poub Yeabs’ Clause in Statute of Limitations.—The four years’ limitation for commencing actions in sec. 343 of the Code of Civil Procedure applies to all suits in equity not strictly of concurrent cognizance in law and equity.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “liability” defined as “[Responsibility, the state of one who is bound in law and justice to do something which may be enforced by action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-07-15· cited 75×
- Moss v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-08-03· cited 68×
- Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1918-03-27· cited 60×
- Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-05-28· cited 59×
- Higa v. MirikitaniHawaii Supreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 52×
- Marin Healthcare District v. Sutter HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-11-14· cited 32×
- Italiani v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1941-06-19· cited 30×
- Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-03-28· cited 21×
- Dore v. ThornburghCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-06-30· cited 20×
- Nougues v. NewlandsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-09-10· cited 20×
- Mitchell v. Banking Corporation of Mont.Montana Supreme Court· 1929-01-19· cited 16×
- People ex rel. Dunn v. MeloneCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-10-08· cited 15×
- Raynor v. MintzerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-06-27· cited 10×
- Department of Mental Hygiene v. HsuCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-03-13· cited 7×
- Christensen v. JessenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-06-04· cited 2×
- Pollock v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1901-10-02· cited 2×
- Buchler v. BlackW.D. Washington· 1913-06-24
- Speich v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1913-03-13
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.