Pillar Development, Inc. v. Fuqua Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• written notice sent twenty-one days too late did not constitute substantial compliance with written notice provision
• “[O]ral notice is not sufficient where written notice is required.”
• “Where a contract contains provisions requiring written notice of a claim for breach, the failure to give notice as required or to show waiver by the party entitled to notice is an independent bar to the maintenance of a successful cause of action on the contract.”
• referring to “written notice” requirements ten times
• written notice requirement was valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).