Pilgrim's Pride Corp. v. Smoak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an officer’s lay opinion about a collision caused by a defendant’s unsafe lane change was legally sufficient to support the jury’s finding that the defendant was seventy-five percent at fault for the collision
• stating that investigating officer’s observations of the weather conditions, the intersection, the location of the two vehicles, and their respective damage “were admissible as rationally based on [the officer’s] perception and were helpful to the determination of who caused the accident.”
• considering police officer‘s disclaimed expertise and finding in dictum that police officer not qualified to testify as 20 expert
• bold font and capitalization omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).