· 8/27/1993
Pilditch v. Board of Education
Citations
- 3 F.3d 1113
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21905
- 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,518
- 62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1216
- 1993 WL 327888
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remarks by prosecution in rebuttal argument are not improper if provoked or invited by defense counsel’s argument
- remarks by prosecution in rebuttal argument are not improper if provoked or invited by defense counsel’s argument
- no prosecutorial misconduct when State commented on lack of motive for a witness to lie when State clearly stated its burden of proof and jury was properly instructed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Easterbrook, Posner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.