Skip to main content
· 8/27/1993

Pilditch v. Board of Education

Citations

  • 3 F.3d 1113
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21905
  • 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,518
  • 62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1216
  • 1993 WL 327888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remarks by prosecution in rebuttal argument are not improper if provoked or invited by defense counsel’s argument
  • remarks by prosecution in rebuttal argument are not improper if provoked or invited by defense counsel’s argument
  • no prosecutorial misconduct when State commented on lack of motive for a witness to lie when State clearly stated its burden of proof and jury was properly instructed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Easterbrook, Posner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.