Pilco v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “solely because of’ standard applies to claims asserted under the Rehabilitation Act
• “[W]e see nothing inconsistent in applying heightened scrutiny when the taking is uncompensated, and a more deferential standard when the taking is fully compensated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).