Pilcher v. Kirk
Citations
- 60 Tex. 162
- 1883 Tex. LEXIS 288
Syllabus
<p>1. Action by tenant in common.—The right of one tenant in common to recover the entire tract of land from one having no title was not affected by the Revised Statutes, but the same exists as recognized in Croft v. Rains, 10 Tex., 523, and Watrous v. McGrew, 16 Tex., 510.</p> <p>2. Good faith—Improvements.— One who purchases land from another, whom he honestly believes to be the grantee of the same, he having the same name with the grantee, and, having paid for and entered upon the land, makes, permanent improvements thereon, ignorant that some other person has the better right, is entitled to recover from the true owner, under the terms of the statute, compensation for his improvements.</p> <p>3. New trial.— See opinion for a case in which the appellant was entitled to a new trial because of the absence of facts to sustain the verdict.</p>
Judges: Stayton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hancock v. Tram Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1885-12-21· cited 31×
- Telfener v. DillardTexas Supreme Court· 1888-02-28· cited 24×
- Murrell v. WrightTexas Supreme Court· 1890-11-18· cited 10×
- Wagers v. SwilleyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1949-05-05· cited 9×
- Root v. MecomCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1976-08-19· cited 4×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.