· 6/9/1989
Piland Corp. v. League Const. Co., Inc.
Citations
- 380 S.E.2d 652
- 238 Va. 187
- 5 Va. Law Rep. 2905
- 1989 Va. LEXIS 123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering “whether Virginia law permits a defendant to set off, by counterclaim, an unliquidated debt against a liquidated debt” (emphasis added)
- “Upon considering a motion for summary judgment, the court must rule, as a matter of law, on the sufficiency of the evidence; it does not weigh the evidence as a finder of fact.”
- “Upon considering a motion for summary judgment, the court must rule, as a matter of law, on the sufficiency of the evidence; it does not weigh the evidence as a finder of fact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lacy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.